The purpose of this article is to view especially girls’ success in education and at work based on earlier – and partly contradictory – research. In order to renew education, it is important to spot the critical points of education and upbringing. Yet, individuals are different regardless of their gender. The debate whether differences between genders depend on individual, biological, and cultural factors or just different emphases in upbringing and education is still ongoing ( Baron-Cohen et al., 2004). Girls and boys register clues from various directions: home, daycare, school, youth culture, social media, marketing and information society, entertainment industry, advertising, and culturally adopted behavior models and expectations mold their behaviors ( Sax, 2017). However, the outcome is that their self-conceptions and worldviews become different. Girls and boys are being upbrought often differently, which can be also unconscious or involuntary action. The strength-based approach can direct teachers’ attention away from good-girl-expectations to universal and genderless strengths, and help girls find success in life that is based on well-being and profound understanding of one’s potential. When people flourish, not only the people but also the society succeeds-and it all starts from school. The ability to recognize and use one’s strengths has not only personal benefits in terms of increased life satisfaction but also societal benefits as strengths help facing adversities, overcome difficulties, and prevent malaise, and increase wellbeing in general. It is based on the ideology of positive psychological research and on the fundamental idea that strengths belong to everyone. As the conclusion we present the role of strength-based teaching as the means to promote gender equality at school. It is crucial that each individual can develop their own strengths for the best of themselves and the society – regardless of their gender. In this article, we analyze gender cap through nine viewpoints by presenting contradictory research results about girls’ and boys’ upbringing and education. The 21st century seems to both repeat and question many of the research results about gender differences. Earlier research has showed that teachers treat girls and boys differently, based on stereo-typical assumptions about troublesome boys and compliant girls, and they also interpret reasons for girls’ and boys’ behaviors differently. Still, they pursue perfect scores that eventually do not bring them satisfaction. Girls learn to regulate their behaviors and study quietly, but this could also hinder their talents to come forward. At the same time, girls are expected to perform well at school. They are not expected to show competitiveness. They realize that they are expected to possess certain traditional female characteristics such as passiveness, adjustment, sensitivity to others’ expectations, and altruism. This phenomenon is connected to girls’ ability to notice conflicting expectations in their environment. The self-esteem of girls who are known to be talented decreases especially during their adolescence. Several studies in the 1970s and 1980s have showed how girls’ courage or willingness to bring out their talents and strengths at school is hindered by many factors. Department of Education, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, Finland.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |